Nobody is backing slackness here. I said if Gizmodo knowingly purchased stolen hardware then they deserve whatever happens to them (innocent until proven guilty). I find it hard to believe that they did not question how the phone was acquired so either:
- They knew the phone was illegally obtained, but chose to ignore it
- The Apple engineer was a part of the deal
- They somehow believed that the phone was not lost or stolen
- Just a bunch of idiots
- Figured the benefits outweighed the risks
With that said, I am defending the journalistic shield that protects journalists from having to revel sources and from other types of prosecution. However if it turns out Gizmodo did commit an illegal act, then the journalistic shield does not apply.
You are a serious HOT HEAD. It is more people like you who don't know how to have a discussion without being arrogant and rude why this country is the way it is. We ought to learn to be civil and have RESPECT in all our dealings.
Seem like the type who will kill a man fi step pan your new Clarks.
Last edited by Technoboy; May 1, 2010 at 11:29 PM.
Lover of Technology, period!!||Currently loaded: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+
It bun yu eh? Yu sound like Bruce, start the cass cass then blaming other people.
I dont wear Clarks boss. But trust me, I may kill you if you're a thief.]
Anyhow yu mek mi have a good laugh over the NEW CLARKS statement stll. Mostly Nike wear here still, ask Techie2000
Last edited by jamtech; May 2, 2010 at 12:50 AM.
Hiss these cooperate asses feel like they have the right to slackness and yes i said slackness just because they're rich
www.carhuntja.com - Buy and Sell Cars in Jamaica! - Coming Soon
www.blackspade-ent.com - Jamaicas #1 Online Community
www.mybbunlock.com - Instant Blackberry Unlocks Only 9.99 USD
www.starallianceja.com - Negril's #1 In Entertainment