Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: (Layman Science Series) Month 3 - How would you defend at an underwater nuke torpedo?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,905
    Rep Power
    21

    Default (Layman Science Series) Month 3 - How would you defend at an underwater nuke torpedo?

    Rant

    Imagine a Kung fu master that sees an oppressor enter a village, who then kills innocents indiscriminately. That Kung fu master does not lift a finger to help victims, or stop more killing. Then furthermore, he says that what he sees happening is A-OK. He does not even have the honor and truth to say that it is a crime but he is either too afraid, or he does not give a sh**. This is the thinking of modern China not just the leaders. People are a reflection of who they follow collectively.

    Imagine a ruler, out of the blue he declares new countries within another country, and then says he is going to rescue them from tyranny, and then does that by bombing the sh** out of said "new" countries. Only people who are just like Donald Trump would think that was brilliant. Which, even IF it was a fact, and not the opinion of a mad man, that these so called "new" countries were "sovereign" countries another country, then those "new" countries still did not ask for any rescuing prior to being invaded 7 days ago (should be majority and in fact was not, actual in my opinion the fraction is much less than 0.0000001%) .

    If we define a "country as a treat" as a country with nukes and no sense of self or world preservation, then all countries that gave up all their nukes cannot be defined as a threat by the first clause.
    Any person that is then claiming such as country is a treat, that person is illogical/full of it.



    Question
    How would you defend against an underwater nuclear torpedo... designed to move slow and quiet, and also packed with enough payload to cause a half a km high tsunami in shallow water... intended to contaminate said water and poison all (in real style) on the coast with the radioactive fallout.

    Some ideas: Drill a hole in mega-lithic rock, double a large garbage bag, cover self, and shelter in hole, hold breath as tsunami passes.

    More expensive solution: Dig separate rooms in mega-lithic rock, make water tight. Enter until tsunami passes. (I am clusterphobic so I would prefer to go hug the tsunami.)

    Defense against aerial nuke: When offensive nuke is in the air, counter launch with significant number of non-nuke regular payload missiles to increase chance of destruction in best corner as possible.



    The Rules are:
    Answers must be complete, and each statement must be sound/logical.

    More than one answer can exists, until its proven false. Hypothesis and theory varies, but scientific logic used must be sound. For example, no marks for cyclic logic. Another example, in cause and effect, no marks for declaring a cause without completely deriving that cause from a generally known and proven fact.

    The better the answer, then the more points awarded. Answers can always be updated at anytime as we learn something new everyday.
    (I do not claim to have THE answer. I will just attempt to provide a possible answer)

    The greater the difficulty, the greater the points. I will give an answer at end of week/month ... hopefully. Repeating my answer awards no points, you will have to come with a better or alternate answer.

    I emphasize that Logics is key to getting points aka "Sound logics" aka "there is no other type of logics". It is either logical or illogical. (Some people claim other forms of logic like administrative logistics which they essentially hide some of the steps because such steps are nefarious and then claim that they are using a special type of logics. That will give you zero marks here. Each step must be given) I believe that we are smart people here, so we logically know that "Many people having the same answer" does not automatic conclude, or imply, that that answer is THE answer. What can make an answer THE answer is sound logics and proven experimental tests.)

    Difficulty
    A-Level to Tertiary Level Physics
    A-Level to Tertiary Level Computer Science
    A-Level to Tertiary Level Information Technology
    etc

    Site share of the week/month
    The Science Asylum - YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXg...wwnLeQ7DXTwXPg
    Let's act on what we agree on now, and argue later on what we don't.
    Black men leave Barbeque alone if Barbeque don't trouble you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,905
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Highly accepted leader and by popular demand:

    Democratically elected Zelensky speaks before being invaded.



    Some other people are so full of it when they claim to want to secure their borders, but they only want to expand their borders over peaceful people and create a new "bigger border" right next to the Force they claim they want to have clearance from. B.S.
    Let's act on what we agree on now, and argue later on what we don't.
    Black men leave Barbeque alone if Barbeque don't trouble you

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,905
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Just to show the power of a positive energy over negative energy

    Russia has the great power and technology to split the atom and go into space. Yet it still CHOSE to kill and steal from those who has less. This is what having a parasitic mindset does instead of a progressive one.

    If they had CHOSEN to apply themselves positively, they could have the best economy ever, without the war and death of so many. They (the powers that be) only think on what they can take from others and help themselves out, rather than what they have that they can use to help the world.

    Another downside of a parasitic mindset is to hold back others, so that one appears superior by relativity, but in reality that one's position has not changed. If anything, one's position would be worse because energy was loss in holding back others.

    A lot of positive things are happening in the world. Nasa has promising missions. Solar energy is current reality. CPU and Gaming is slowly coming back from crazy land prices. Progressive mindset is to pioneer useful technology to the world, not invest even more in W.M.D
    Let's act on what we agree on now, and argue later on what we don't.
    Black men leave Barbeque alone if Barbeque don't trouble you

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,905
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Russia hold elections in Ukraine

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...826_story.html

    I wonder how many of Russia's Elections in Russia were like the ones carried out in Ukraine. Unfortunately, there is a great lack of international evidence yeah or nah, because Russia's elections were their own business. However on the Ukraine side, western news and videos speaks volume.

    Very interesting political career

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin

    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (born 7 October 1952) is a Russian politician and former intelligence officer who has been serving as the president of Russia since 2012, having previously served between 2000 and 2008. He was the prime minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000 and again from 2008 to 2012, thus having served continuously as either president or prime minister from 1999 onwards.

    Putin worked as a KGB foreign intelligence officer for 16 years, rising to the rank of lieutenant colonel (podpolkovnik), before resigning in 1991 to begin a political career in Saint Petersburg. He moved to Moscow in 1996 to join the administration of president Boris Yeltsin. He briefly served as director of the Federal Security Service (FSB) and secretary of the Security Council, before being appointed as prime minister in August 1999. After the resignation of Yeltsin, Putin became acting president and, less than four months later, was elected outright to his first term as president. He was reelected in 2004. As he was constitutionally limited to two consecutive terms as president at the time, Putin served as prime minister again from 2008 to 2012 under Dmitry Medvedev. He returned to the presidency in 2012 in an election marred by allegations of fraud and protests and was reelected in 2018. In April 2021, following a referendum, he signed into law constitutional amendments including one that would allow him to run for reelection twice more, potentially extending his presidency to 2036.
    Imagine how bat poop crazy you would have to be to bomb a country indiscriminately so as to vacate thousand of citizens, then invade with soldiers, and occupy, and then for the few citizens that leave, you would carry out an election with them, for the country, after the fact of your invasion, and think that that act was right. Or even worse, think that everyone else will believe that is right. Two orders of magnitude above bat poop crazy.

    From day one he invaded unprovoked, and had no right to be there. Then he used bat poop administrative logistics to start killing innocent civilians, and really believes that the mad ship has not sailed and gone long time, as he tries to convince the world that he is following laws that he make up on the fly.
    Last edited by crosswire; Oct 9, 2022 at 02:10 AM.
    Let's act on what we agree on now, and argue later on what we don't.
    Black men leave Barbeque alone if Barbeque don't trouble you

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •