Originally Posted by
kilaj1
Norton Ghost and Symantec Ghost are 2 different evils...I spit on norton ghost...I laugh at the sys admin for using it and I get a headache when people mention it.....
Symantec Ghost is the corporate level of Ghost, the command line switches should be the same but Symantec one is more powerful imo.
Its not the system really recognizing the GHO format you would ahve to do some scripting to get ghost to launch, I actually have the entire script(s) needed
K let me give you a quick run down on how my recovery partition works, lets say i have a computer with a 160GB HDD.
Without Tumbdrive and creating the recovery partition localy
- Create 2 partitions using Diskpart 1x10GB for Recovery partition, 1x(reset of disk space) for OS.
- Create the base install on the large partition with all windows 7 updates all apps installed, create a ghost image of this partition and copy it to the second partition.
- After customizing WinPE with a GUI menu and adding scripts to the menu add the WinPE image (this is not the same as the ghost image) to the smaller partition.
- Using BCDedit you configure Windows 7 boot menu to show the recovery partition, this is essentially an entry pointing the above mentioned WinPE file.
- Within the WinPE environment when you select the Option to ghost ( i have a menu entry saying "System Recovery") the ghost script will run and start the ghost process and afterwords change the computer name and SID. This usually takes from 10mins to 15mins depending on the system specs and size.
So if my MBR gets corrupted, the recovery partition is rendered useless?
LAPTOP:- Alienware M11x C2D @1.7GHz, SATA 300GB HDD, nVidia GT 335M 1GB (dis.), Intel GMA HD-64MB (int.), 2GB DDR3 RAM @1066MHz, 1.3MP webcam Running Windows7 64bit
MOBILE DEVICE:- SGS3 T999 dual core Qualcom Snapdragon @1.5GHz, 2GB RAM, 16GB (int. SD), Adreno 225 GPU, 8MP pri. cam, 1.9MP ff running Stock:4.0.4 UVLH2 modem