CLICK-> GAMER IDs IT Admin & Project Manager --> CLICK-> LAPTOP ASUS TF300T DESKTOP->Microsoft Student Partner (MSP)IF THE TRUTH HURTS CLOSE THE THREAD
If being a nerd means I make more money than you by just walking into a room, while still having a wife and social life... then it SUCKS To Be YOU!
Juss checked on the details for all three(3) SSD's on Newegg and so far the OCZ has the best overall features and performance from what I saw.
They all have similar read speeds but the write speed is what seems to have the major differences and the OCZ Vortex is showing the highest MTBF(Mean Time Between Failures). Well, if teh difference is just about 2-3 seconds access times for certain programs or OS boot time, then it doesn't matter which one you get then. Just get the cheapest or the one you prefer.
Android Crew - HTC One X+
PC Specs - Motherboard: Asus Maximus Gene V | Processor: Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz(3.80GHz turbo) | Memory: 2x 4gig Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 | Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 560 SC(1 GB) | Monitors: Asus 24" HD LED+Dell 17" | Xfire ID --> Powpow90
The older OCZs have controller issues. Read the link i posted earlier about SSDs
There is much more to that than SSDs. The newer versions of SSDs are much better than the older ones.
The difference with the newer versions are quickly becoming negligible.
To ensure you get the highest performance from the drive you want to stick with SSDs with Toggle or Synchronous mode NAND or better.
You always want to try to get the best bang for your buck
http://www.overclock.net/t/1179518/s..._SSDComponentsWhy listen to me?
I'm going to focus on SATA SSDs as that is the majority of the consumer SSD market. I have done countless hours of my own research over this topic and have nearly a full understanding of what is ideal. I am not the say all and end all, I am just stating what I think. These suggestions will be off of current SSDs and will not consider older ones which are replaced by newer models.
The difference in real world between all current gen SSDs is so minute that it doesn't matter if a benchmark says one is faster than another. Even the difference between SSDs on SATA 2 vs having it on SATA 3 and even having 2 in a RAID 0 array is going to be a insignificant change for the average user, please keep that in mind...even when I use performance tests to validate one over the other in benchmarks. tongue.gif
clipped for brevity
Last edited by Arch_Angel; October 8, 2012 at 10:46 PM. Reason: shortened quote
CLICK-> GAMER IDs IT Admin & Project Manager --> CLICK-> LAPTOP ASUS TF300T DESKTOP->Microsoft Student Partner (MSP)IF THE TRUTH HURTS CLOSE THE THREAD
If being a nerd means I make more money than you by just walking into a room, while still having a wife and social life... then it SUCKS To Be YOU!
^^ Seriously you need to learn to just point to the page...this extra long quote is distracting!
Lover of Technology, period!!||Currently loaded: Sony Xperia Z Black
Check me out on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/jayouth
Last edited by King_Jay16; October 9, 2012 at 01:30 AM.
CLICK-> GAMER IDs IT Admin & Project Manager --> CLICK-> LAPTOP ASUS TF300T DESKTOP->Microsoft Student Partner (MSP)IF THE TRUTH HURTS CLOSE THE THREAD
If being a nerd means I make more money than you by just walking into a room, while still having a wife and social life... then it SUCKS To Be YOU!
Out of these two(2) coolers which do you guys think is better:
http://www.amazon.com/Cooler-Master-...=hyper+212+evo
or
http://www.amazon.com/Zalman-CNPS990...man+cpu+cooler
Android Crew - HTC One X+
PC Specs - Motherboard: Asus Maximus Gene V | Processor: Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz(3.80GHz turbo) | Memory: 2x 4gig Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 | Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 560 SC(1 GB) | Monitors: Asus 24" HD LED+Dell 17" | Xfire ID --> Powpow90
well the Zalman seems more sexy, but wot u shud do is google n search for reviews on both coolers n see which is better for u, btw i saved u the trouble :P
ZALMAN
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1468/7/
Coolermaster
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/%5B...2_evo_review_0
dunno why u guyz like using fan cooling so much u need to get over the fear of water cooling!
CASE: Danger Den Torture Rack, CPU: Core i7 920, Cooler: Custom EK acrylic water Loop, MoBo:EVGA X58 SLI, RAM: 6Gb Corsair XMS 1600Mhz, HDD: OCZ Vertex 4 128Gb / Seagate 1.5Tb, GPUs: EVGA GTX 580 Ultra Classified, PSU: Antec High Current 1200Watt
Link 1 - Guru3D review
Link 2 - ForstyTech review
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/artic...-Review/1407/6
In the end, it is up to you to decide whether the price for either one is worth it.
The H212 is a "low" level cooler that does rather well...
The 9900 is a high end cooler.. that does fairly well. Could be better.
@Taxiwarez
Liquid cooling can get expensive rather fast, others just don't trust it. Others prefer a custom loop than a closed-loop. But water cooling is nice.
Last edited by King_Jay16; October 9, 2012 at 09:54 AM.
CLICK-> GAMER IDs IT Admin & Project Manager --> CLICK-> LAPTOP ASUS TF300T DESKTOP->Microsoft Student Partner (MSP)IF THE TRUTH HURTS CLOSE THE THREAD
If being a nerd means I make more money than you by just walking into a room, while still having a wife and social life... then it SUCKS To Be YOU!
Plus Air Coolers are getting as good as closed loop water coolers.
AMD Phenom II X4 960T Zosma @ 4GHz | Thermalright Ultima 90 CPU cooler | GIGBABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P | Sapphire 6950 unlocked | 6Gb Gskill RAM | 1.5TB total HD | Gateway 22 inch LCD Monitor | Zalman 750W PSU | LENOVO SL500