Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Your views on Kaspersky versus Symantec Antivirus

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    293
    Rep Power
    0

    Post Your views on Kaspersky versus Symantec Antivirus

    Share your views on the performance of Kaspersky anti-virus versus Symantec (norton).
    Last edited by jamaicandiva; May 18, 2006 at 08:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,814
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Anything is better than symantec!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,309
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I rate the equally - they suck!!! AntiVir Personal edition or ZoneAlarm with Anti-Virus for me...
    111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,547
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leoandru
    Anything is better than symantec!
    LMAO. DWL. blunt statement, but honest.
    Macbook Core Duo 1.83ghz
    OS X 10.4.10 - 1.25gb Ram

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    To me Kaspersky simply better. It has all that Norton has and uses up much less memory. I just love it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    293
    Rep Power
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by T-R-E-V WILL
    To me Kaspersky simply better. It has all that Norton has and uses up much less memory. I just love it.

    wouldnt agree with you more

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,011
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    hmm norton wasn't that bad to me.. you people just probably need better computers or soemthing.. i mean i dont run anti virus at all so dont get me wrong.. however back in the day when i used to i thought norton was good stuff.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    293
    Rep Power
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by death_knight
    hmm norton wasn't that bad to me.. you people just probably need better computers or soemthing.. i mean i dont run anti virus at all so dont get me wrong.. however back in the day when i used to i thought norton was good stuff.
    get back into time my dear friend...that was then, this is now.............comments are based on experience

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,096
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    kaspersky is the leading antivirus today, i wouldnt give my enemy a norton toilet paper. i have however heard from multiple persons that the corporate versions of norton perform well.
    Dude, Aren't the "good things that come to those who wait" just the leftovers from the people who got them first.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,011
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    norton 05 isn't that far off though is it.. i mean what else did they add the most annoying thing that norton did was started scanning my rar files and my exe's on uncompression before moving to install or total extraction. while beign safe it sorta slowed things down but it wasn't anything drastic.. hence i say i dont think norton is that slow. and its really safe btw.. who with the user of norton got virus's i surely didn't.. my laptop was like a jail cell nothing got in nothing got out unless i wanted it to.

    zone alarm was way to tight and difficult to configure (death shrapnell i call it) and kraspersky or whatever just never called out to me.. now.. no antivirus calls out to me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •