Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: hype amd 64 3500+ clawhammer

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    253
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    thats what i was thinking, an dis guy come with some ignorant post "clawhammer better" an nuh seh why. I kno for a fact that him dont read thru the technical data sheets that amd has on there web site. Yes about theremal characteristics among many other things, but still him can jump up an say "oh its the better core"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,227
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    point being....with its low(er) power consumption ( which is still about the same as a winchester) and instruction updating (how many benchmarks make use of SSE3 right now anyway?) and what not....it doesnt offer that great a difference in performance (kinda like prescott and northwood...in a strange way) ...if unno see what i saying.


    i almost feel its like a jump to the same place.
    ah well...whatever
    >>Insert something witty here<<

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    875
    Rep Power
    0

    Post

    so everybody in here say buy the venice over clawhammer so venice it is
    Video Game Technician in Jamaica 3968609
    Ultra Aluminus Black Case/ASUS Rampage Formula 2 /Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 oc 3.6/ZALMAN CNPS9700/8GB G-Skill ripjaw DDR3 1600/EVGA GeForce GTX super oc 470 edition /SAMSUNG Black 32" Widescreen hdtv/etc/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •