Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Major cloud service provider publishes HDD reliability chart

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,074
    Rep Power
    27

    Default Major cloud service provider publishes HDD reliability chart

    Backblaze is a major cloud service provider which, being in the mass storage business, uses a huge amount of HDDs in
    its equipment. Computerworld reports that the company has been releasing data over the past few months about its experience
    with HDDs including the fact that just over one in five of the "consumer-grade" hard drives it employs in its Storage Pod RAID racks
    has failed over the past four years. Yesterday Backblaze published its most thought provoking chart yet - which correlates HDD
    brands and disk failure rates.

    Backblaze's Storage Pods, made up of arrays of RAIDed disks adding up to as much as 180TB of storage each, contained over
    27,000 drives at the end of 2013. The firm used drives from all the major manufacturers including Seagate, WD, Hitachi, Toshiba
    and Samsung. However the numbers of Toshiba and Samsung which drives it employed are statistically insignificant so aren't part
    of the table below. Let's cut to the chase and take a gander at the table (below).

    Following previous blog posts by Backblaze on the topics of drive lifetimes and drive reliability readers were keen to see these
    figures tallied into charts with manufacturer names against them. Pulling no punches Backblaze has published its information in
    a blog post called "What Hard Drive Should I Buy?"

    Commenting upon the graph depicting the 36 month survival rate Backblaze says "Hitachi does really well. There is an initial die-off of
    Western Digital drives, and then they are nice and stable. The Seagate drives start strong, but die off at a consistently higher rate,
    with a burst of deaths near the 20-month mark."

    Despite the charts above Backblaze's current favourite purchase is a Seagate drive; the 4TB Seagate Desktop HDD.15 (ST4000DM000).
    However it does note that "We’ll have to keep an eye on them, though. Historically, Seagate drives have performed well at first, and
    then had higher failure rates later." Another favourite is the Western Digital 3TB Red (WD30EFRX), we are told.

    With the WD acquisition of Hitachi around 18 months ago it will be interesting to see if the union of these two storage providers will
    produce even better reliability. Also I note that the relatively tiny amount of Samsung brand drives used by Backblaze look very
    promising in the stats that are available.
    http://hexus.net/tech/news/storage/6...ability-chart/
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    You assume all risk for your use. © 2006 Azix Solutions.
    All rights reserved.

    Dropbox: http://db.tt/8qVS35lo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    hmm dont feel so bad about my hitachi drive now lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •