Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Titanfall

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16,974
    Rep Power
    33

    Default

    This game is fun, but I am not sure if it is worth $60 :/

    Been playing it since saturday.

    SLAPPA Phenom II AM3 Overclocking Essentials
    I HAVE HIGHEST OC ON TECHJA 4.2ghz
    4890oc beats gtx 285
    PS3 FAILCAKE
    ps3 only advantage is bluray
    4890 oc roundup
    http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/skugpezz.png
    Mi know dem fear mi!!!!! Gigabyte 790x ud4p
    phenom 2 955@3.8ghz 24/7 stable , 4GB ddr3 1333@1.5ghz ,3850 256MB (temp card) (4890 soon),700 watt dual rail psu, (overclocking rules) my avatar represents my personality

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,851
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Nice game but will buy it when it hits the bargain bin

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    3,184
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    @pezz thanx for the 3mb bmp files

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,074
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    not a fan. I don't like the bots. Hard to get a human kill a lot of the time because of the number of people there. Only having 6 ppl on the other team to shoot isn't fun. The bots do not make up for it.

    This is really just cod with robots. I don't like the pace of the game, the graphics are not clear, textures are mostly meh. I don't think the game is going to be that big but the marketing behind it will get sales. I actually could almost max it without aa on my build =/. It's xbox360 quality for the most part I think. Not much better, at least not noticeably. Call of duty people might like it a lot.

    Taken on by an Intel i7-3770K PC clocked at 4.3GHz, with 16GB RAM and a relatively modest Radeon HD 7850 GPU with just 1GB of GDDR5, we manage to max the game out almost entirely while holding 60fps at 2x MSAA
    Although based on the Source engine, it's clear that a lot of work has gone into improving the tech - it's now DirectX 11 based, it utilises up to six CPU cores, but despite that, it's hardly a processing heavyweight: while we deployed the i7, further tests reveal that even a lowly AMD FX-6300 or Core i3 is capable of providing solid 60fps gameplay.
    Next gen not even once. They had to turn down shadows to keep above 40fps dips.

    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...-tech-analysis

    It's quite possible i don't like it because of the effects of the source engine. Always had issues with it. This is EA so why not use frostbite...? EA so dumb sometimes.
    Last edited by semitop; Feb 17, 2014 at 05:44 PM.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    You assume all risk for your use. © 2006 Azix Solutions.
    All rights reserved.

    Dropbox: http://db.tt/8qVS35lo

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16,974
    Rep Power
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by semitop View Post
    not a fan. I don't like the bots. Hard to get a human kill a lot of the time because of the number of people there. Only having 6 ppl on the other team to shoot isn't fun. The bots do not make up for it.

    This is really just cod with robots. I don't like the pace of the game, the graphics are not clear, textures are mostly meh. I don't think the game is going to be that big but the marketing behind it will get sales. I actually could almost max it without aa on my build =/. It's xbox360 quality for the most part I think. Not much better, at least not noticeably. Call of duty people might like it a lot.
    Next gen not even once. They had to turn down shadows to keep above 40fps dips.

    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...-tech-analysis

    It's quite possible i don't like it because of the effects of the source engine. Always had issues with it. This is EA so why not use frostbite...? EA so dumb sometimes.

    Lol you need a better computer.

    Mine are clear.

    Also I don't find it to be anything like COD. And ghost looks terrible graphics wise compared to this.

    I do not think it is worth $60 though. But I will still buy it.


    @ Owen you are welcome lol. I did not realize they were bmp.
    SLAPPA Phenom II AM3 Overclocking Essentials
    I HAVE HIGHEST OC ON TECHJA 4.2ghz
    4890oc beats gtx 285
    PS3 FAILCAKE
    ps3 only advantage is bluray
    4890 oc roundup
    http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/skugpezz.png
    Mi know dem fear mi!!!!! Gigabyte 790x ud4p
    phenom 2 955@3.8ghz 24/7 stable , 4GB ddr3 1333@1.5ghz ,3850 256MB (temp card) (4890 soon),700 watt dual rail psu, (overclocking rules) my avatar represents my personality

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,074
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    I think this would have been a good free to play game. Though I don't think EA knows how to make those properly. Not worth buying IMO
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    You assume all risk for your use. © 2006 Azix Solutions.
    All rights reserved.

    Dropbox: http://db.tt/8qVS35lo

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,254
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    BREAKING NEWS: The PC version of Titanfall will be a 21GB download, and will take up 48GB when installed.
    The PC version of Titanfall will be a 21GB download, and will take up 48GB when installed.

    Respawn Entertainment founder Vince Zampella confirmed the figures on Twitter last week in response to a question posed by a fan.

    @MyStoryTVyt @Titanfallgame about 21GB of download and 48GB installed.— Vince Zampella (@VinceZampella) February 24, 2014
    http://www.computerandvideogames.com...VG-General-RSS
    NZXT S340*Asus Prime B350 Plus*AMD Ryzen 5 1600*Cooler Master Masterliquid 240 AIO*8GB Patriot Viper 3000MHZ DDR4*SanDisk 120GB SSD*Corsair CX 650 80+Bronze PSU*Windows 10 Pro 64bit*Acer R Series 21.5" IPS 1080p 4ms Monitor

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,918
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grim386 View Post
    BREAKING NEWS: The PC version of Titanfall will be a 21GB download, and will take up 48GB when installed.


    http://www.computerandvideogames.com...VG-General-RSS
    Ahhh, those HD textures . I'm getting this game after my new video card arrives. Trailer for it is decent too:

    Current Android - OnePlus 7T Pro
    PC Specs - Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560-PLUS | Processor: Intel Core i5-11600K (stock) | Memory: 32 gigs Corsair Vengeance DDR4@3200mhz | Video Card: ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 (OC Edition) | Monitor: ASUS TUF Gaming 27" 2K Monitor | Steam ID -> Powpow

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    485
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Powpow View Post
    Ahhh, those HD textures . I'm getting this game after my new video card arrives. Trailer for it is decent too:

    Ahhh nope. Think I'll just stick to youtube videos on this one.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    240
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i already Bought ma Deluxe Edition, cant wait to play this dam game, i like the fact the persons who bought Deluxe will be able to play the game first (3hrs) b4 launch
    CASE: Dell Aurora R6, CPU: Core i7 7700k, Cooler: Gen3 NoBrand H80i, MoBo:Dell z270, RAM: 32Gb Curcial DDR4 @ 3000Mhz, HDD: Samsung 500Gb 970 M.2 NVME/ 3x WD 4Tb Blue Ed, GPUs: EVGA RTX 2080 8Gb DDR6, PSU: Generic Dell 1000watts

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •