Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: wireless and lan segments not talking

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0

    Default wireless and lan segments not talking

    scenario

    windows pc 1 connected by wireless on ip 192.xx.xx

    windows pc 2 connected by ethernet on ip 198.xx.xx

    linux file server connected by ethernet ip 198.xx.xx

    all are in the same domain so privileges aren't an issue

    pc1 can browse the network and see the file server but cant access the file server
    pc2 can browse the network and see and access the file server


    i have no control over the configuration of the wireless access point that issues the 192.xx.xx ip

    any suggestions am open to

    being racking my brain
    computer cell phone sales services and repairs 24/7 technician
    ldougharty@yahoo.com add to msn or yahoo messenger
    twitter @hotheadzo
    4382112 digicel

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    5,192
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Depending on your setup you may have to set the requisite options to bridge the networks. The IP ranges differ and some devices/boxes may isolate each range/bank. Find the option for bridging and you should be fine.
    Knowing the solution doesn't mean knowing the method. Yet answering correctly and regurgitation are considered "learning" and "knowledge".

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,959
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    windows pc 1 connected by wireless on ip 192.xx.xx

    windows pc 2 connected by ethernet on ip 198.xx.xx

    linux file server connected by ethernet ip 198.xx.xx
    192.xx.xx.xx is on one network segment and 198.xx.xx.xx is on another network segment. By themselves, network cards cannot communicate with cards that are on other segments.

    Can you change the machines on the 198.xx.xx segment to 192.xx.xx.xx addresses?

    If not, you will need to put a router between both segments. A router has at least 2 network cards. In your example, one network card would have a 192.xx.xx.xx address and the other would have a 198.xx.xx.xx address. Network packets would travel though one network card into the router and out through the other network card.

    If you have an old computer, you can use Pfsense or Smoothwall to act as a router. Both products were designed to provide routing/firewall services between the internet and a LAN. However, you can disable the firewall and use them between network segments.

    http://www.pfsense.org/
    http://www.smoothwall.org/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    329
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    We know that the wireless router is issuing the 192.xxx.xxx.xxx range, but what is issuing the 198.xxx.xxx.xxx range?
    EQUIVALENT ENTERPRISE

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,629
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    If i recall correctly you can also use the route add command, not sure if it will work in your case but i did this across VLANs and it worked
    CompTIA A+ Certified
    MCTS - Microsoft Certified Technical Specialist - Server Virtualization
    MCSA - Microsoft Certified System Administrator - Messaging

    It wasn't me!...........okay it was but you have no right to assume!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    5,192
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Thinking about it again - aside from the bridging - you could just disable DHCP on one of the devices - like the WIFI router - and let all DHCP be controlled by a single source. This way the router just acts as a media converter from copper to wireless.
    Knowing the solution doesn't mean knowing the method. Yet answering correctly and regurgitation are considered "learning" and "knowledge".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •