Ccna routing protocols and subinterfaces

[NEW TECHIE]

I am new to the cisco world have completed module 1-3 now looking to do module 4 then to the ccna exam...been doing some practice labs in one of my labs I have created a few vlans on a switch and the corresponding subinterfaces on the router to match those vlans along with the native however the problem is now I am trying to get those the networks of the subinterfaces in a routing protocol eg...rip, eigrp or ospf so I can route them to other routers for connection and communication with the outside networds but no matter what I tried its just now working the routes arent being distributed. So now it leaves me to wonder is it possible to route subinterfaces within a routing protocol and if so who is it done


PLEASE HELP!

[WanabeR]

I am new to the cisco world have completed module 1-3 now looking to do module 4 then to the ccna exam...been doing some practice labs in one of my labs I have created a few vlans on a switch and the corresponding subinterfaces on the router to match those vlans along with the native however the problem is now I am trying to get those the networks of the subinterfaces in a routing protocol eg...rip, eigrp or ospf so I can route them to other routers for connection and communication with the outside networds but no matter what I tried its just now working the routes arent being distributed. So now it leaves me to wonder is it possible to route subinterfaces within a routing protocol and if so who is it done


PLEASE HELP!

Post the config. Use a text file or use forum codes. Did you configure the trunk properly? Did you enable the routing protocols and advertise all relevant networks?

[NEW TECHIE]

IP ROUTE
=================================
Gateway of last resort is not set

8.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 8.8.8.0 [90/2681856] via 10.0.54.5, 00:04:22, Serial0/0/0
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.0.50.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.30
C 10.0.53.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.20
C 10.0.54.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1
C 10.0.54.4/30 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
D 10.0.54.8/30 [90/2681856] via 10.0.54.5, 00:04:22, Serial0/0/0
[90/2681856] via 10.0.54.1, 00:04:20, Serial0/0/1
C 10.0.54.16/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.23
=================================================

RUNNING CONFIG
=================================================
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 10.0.53.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.23
encapsulation dot1Q 23 native
ip address 10.0.54.18 255.255.255.252
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.30
encapsulation dot1Q 30
ip address 10.0.50.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface Serial0/0/0
ip address 10.0.54.6 255.255.255.252
!
interface Serial0/0/1
ip address 10.0.54.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
!
router eigrp 90
network 10.0.54.4 0.0.0.3
network 10.0.54.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
!

So far all the subinterface are in the routing table as directly connected which is corrected but my question is do I need to enter all the subinterface networks in the eigrp process to have them advertise and also is it possible to use a summerized route and which interface should I place it on if possible?

[WanabeR]

So far all the subinterface are in the routing table as directly connected which is corrected but my question is do I need to enter all the subinterface networks in the eigrp process to have them advertise and also is it possible to use a summerized route and which interface should I place it on if possible?

What is the topology? I see router on a stick here. If you have other routers connected to this one then show an ip route from that router.

[TwistedPair]

Add each network, currently you are only advertising the networks on the serial interface. The sub-interfaces should be treated the same way also can't be summarized based on your addressing scheme. For example you could summarize network with 10.0.54.0 0.0.0.255. I use OSPF on my network so I not as sharp on eigrp as I used to be but that should be close.

[crazeeplayer]

yes u shud advertise di networks 10.0.50 and 53 networks with di 0.0.0.255 an ll of the networks shud come under it